Difference between revisions of "Lecture 4"
From CyberSecurity
(→Discussion) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Speakers== | ==Speakers== | ||
* Steve Maurer: The Bioshield Dilemma: Developing New Technologies at an Affordable Price ([http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~scotch/maurer.htm Maurer]) | * Steve Maurer: The Bioshield Dilemma: Developing New Technologies at an Affordable Price ([http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~scotch/maurer.htm Maurer]) | ||
| − | * Don Prosnitz: Security and Civil Liberties: Can Technology Improve the Balance? | + | * Don Prosnitz: Security and Civil Liberties: Can Technology Improve the Balance? ([http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/coe/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=37 Prosnitz ]) |
* Eric Norman, LLNL: Cargo screening technologies | * Eric Norman, LLNL: Cargo screening technologies | ||
==Readings== | ==Readings== | ||
| − | + | * Finishing up Walter Laqueur, [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0826414354/qid=1124044537/sr=8-5/ref=pd_bbs_5/103-6297919-8739058?v=glance&s=books&n=507846, No End to War: Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century], 2004. | |
| + | * Steve Maurer, [http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/csep590/05au/readings/Maurer_When_Patents_Fail.pdf When Patents Fail: Finding New Drugs for the Developing Words], May 2005. | ||
| − | + | ==Discussion== | |
| + | Participate in the [http://cubist.cs.washington.edu/CyberSecurity/index.php/Talk:Lecture_4 discussion]. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:41, 27 September 2005
Technology Policy and the War on Terror
Speakers
- Steve Maurer: The Bioshield Dilemma: Developing New Technologies at an Affordable Price (Maurer)
- Don Prosnitz: Security and Civil Liberties: Can Technology Improve the Balance? (Prosnitz )
- Eric Norman, LLNL: Cargo screening technologies
Readings
- Finishing up Walter Laqueur, No End to War: Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, 2004.
- Steve Maurer, When Patents Fail: Finding New Drugs for the Developing Words, May 2005.
Discussion
Participate in the discussion.
