Security Review – The USPS Mailbox

By mccoyt at 1:04 pm on January 13, 2008 | 2 Comments

Overview

The blue USPS mailbox, a ubiquitous object on American streets today, is one of the most recognizable security devices currently in use. Despite its many shapes and sizes, its purpose boils down simply to one of protection of privacy, integrity, and access control. Customers who drop off letters or packages in a mailbox expect their mail to be protected from the prying eyes of strangers, safe from theft, and handled only by authorized USPS personnel. Indeed, the promise of security has helped the USPS to remain competitive over the years.

Assets/security goals

From the perspective of all parties involved, the primary assets to be considered are the mailbox’s contents and the mailbox itself. Arguably the most critical security goals are the confidentiality and integrity of the mail. Without such goals, customers would have little assurance that their private correspondence would remain private, or indeed that their mail would arrive at all. Repeated violations would likely destroy the post office’s business quickly as customers lost confidence in their ability to maintain the integrity of the mail traffic. Additionally, the mailbox itself is a valuable asset that should be durable and resistant to damage.

Potential Adversaries/Threats

The threats to the mailbox are numerous, due in large part to one of its most endearing qualities: its ease of access and public location. With potentially thousands of people accessing the box every day, the variety of potential threats is numerous. They might include access to the mail by circumventing the rotating door at the top of the box, breaching the mailbox by damaging or destroying it, or theft of the entire mailbox itself.  Such acts could conceivably be carried out by any member of the public, but would more likely be someone who had used the mailbox and wished to retrieve their parcel, someone interested in the data contained within the mailbox (for the purpose of identity theft or other nefarious purposes), or those interested merely in vandalism.

Potential Weaknesses

One significant weakness of the mailbox is the vulnerability of the box to physical damage. A determined person with the correct tools could likely breach a box given enough time. Secondly, the contents of a mailbox are perhaps most vulnerable when they are being transferred from the mailbox to a vehicle or another container. At that time, all of the defenses of the mailbox are rendered ineffective when a mailperson opens the box to retrieve the mail.  

Potential Defenses

Given that mailboxes are currently made out of relatively sturdy materials, it seems likely that improvements in security would be best targeted at denying adversaries the opportunity and time necessary to breach them. This could be accomplished by embedding the mailbox in the wall of a building or pillar, and placing them only in well lit and frequently travelled areas. By doing so, the surface area of the box vulnerable to attack would be minimized, and the likelihood of an attacker having enough time to breach the box without being seen and reported is reduced. Additionally, boxes in high-risk areas could be emptied by more than one USPS employee, reducing the likelihood that someone would attempt to steal the mail as it is removed from the mailbox.

Risks

There is some overlap in the threats faced by the mailbox and its primary weaknesses, and consequently there seems to be a relatively high risk of one or more of the threats described above materializing. Due to the difficulty of breaking into the box, it seems more likely that the highest risk lies in those threats easiest to perpetrate, such as vandalism, while stealing the mailbox itself seems like a relatively low risk given the size and weight of many boxes. The risk would seem to be allocated more heavily toward the mailbox itself then, and not the mail inside.

Conclusion

There’s actually some data recorded by the USPS on mailbox crimes. It turns out that the actual rate of mailbox crimes is in fact very small. The post office investigated 4,545 cases of volume mail thefts in 2006, of which mailbox thefts are only one part. Given that the post office delivers around 200 billion parcels to more than 147 million locations, such a number is statistically quite small.  Consequently, it would seem that the security measures currently in place to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the mailboxes is sufficient and appropriately scaled to the threat posed. 

Filed under: Physical Security,Security Reviews2 Comments »

2 Comments

  • 1
    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by maxaller

    January 13, 2008 @ 1:30 pm

    All good points — I wouldn’t have thought of insetting the box into pillars/buildings. Of course, this would also be difficult and would possibly require some legislature that required builders at certain sites to accommodate these special mailboxes.

    There are some other points to be had here. USPS is certainly not without competition; I believe for many things UPS/FedEx/DHL would also be plausible alternatives. USPS is really only popular for mailing letter-sized mail for two reasons: price and convenience. Mailing something costs less than 50 cents and there’s probably a drop box somewhere that you have to walk. But that’s just the thing — the prevalence of these drop boxes makes it all the more likely that one will be in a secluded quiet part of town where mail theft is more likely. On the bright side, less people nearby probably means less people are using the mail box, but even one stolen identity is too much.

    Lastly, the statistics you cite in your conclusion suggest more about the volume of mail stolen each time mail is stolen than the frequency of thefts, so I did a little math (but the conclusion is the same as yours). For the average state, there is a volume mail theft once every 4 days (4545/365/50=0.24). Given that there are an average of 3 million locations per state…that’s not much at all.

    Maybe next week you can do a review of those drop off points that the morning mailmen use that aren’t for regular civilians…

  • 2
    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by rudd

    January 13, 2008 @ 7:25 pm

    Very nice review. I wanted to add one point that might also help explain the low number of mail theft incidents:

    Since USPS is a federal organization, crimes against it are tried as federal crimes. Sentences for crimes related to USPS also tend to be high (this example notes that this particular person could be charged with 5 years in prison and/or $250,000 for mail theft). My hunch is that the fact that mailboxes are in public places combined with the fact that tampering with them is a federal crime is a significant deterrent to many potential adversaries.

    This is a nice example of how publicly visible assets combined with extremely high penalties can provide an effective layer of security. It should be noted, however, that severe penalties are not an effective deterrent against someone who is not concerned with the risks of their crime.

RSS feed for comments on this post