<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current Event &#8211; A Broader Look on Wireless Access Point Vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cubist.cs.washington.edu/Security/2009/03/16/current-event-a-broader-look-on-wireless-access-point-vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cubist.cs.washington.edu/Security/2009/03/16/current-event-a-broader-look-on-wireless-access-point-vulnerabilities/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:35:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://cubist.cs.washington.edu/Security/2009/03/16/current-event-a-broader-look-on-wireless-access-point-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-8409</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cubist.cs.washington.edu/Security/?p=1126#comment-8409</guid>
		<description>As you correctly point out, it&#039;s becoming more and more naive to assume that a wired network is intrinsically secure due to the possibility of rogue access points, or of access jacks or cables being accessible in semi-public areas. 

Rather than implement a clever knocking sequence to activate an access point, a simpler / cheaper method would be to plug the access point into a timeswitch. Unless the security audits are carried out (say) between 4pm on a Friday and 9am on a Monday, there&#039;s no access point to detect. (The timeswitch is more noticeable on a physical inspection, however). 

As well as Bluetooth, consider also the possibilities for  networking opened up by mobile phones / GM GSM devices: worldwide accessibility, difficulty distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate radio traffic, and  network access only on demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you correctly point out, it&#8217;s becoming more and more naive to assume that a wired network is intrinsically secure due to the possibility of rogue access points, or of access jacks or cables being accessible in semi-public areas. </p>
<p>Rather than implement a clever knocking sequence to activate an access point, a simpler / cheaper method would be to plug the access point into a timeswitch. Unless the security audits are carried out (say) between 4pm on a Friday and 9am on a Monday, there&#8217;s no access point to detect. (The timeswitch is more noticeable on a physical inspection, however). </p>
<p>As well as Bluetooth, consider also the possibilities for  networking opened up by mobile phones / GM GSM devices: worldwide accessibility, difficulty distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate radio traffic, and  network access only on demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
