Phalanx attains Slashdot fame!

By alpers at 1:40 pm on April 22, 2008

I’m not sure if many people read this blog, but I recently noticed that the UW project Phalanx (slides, paper, and poster available from Colin Dixon’s site, recently featured on Slashdot) brought up the idea of countering botnets by setting up neutral (’white-hat’ was tossed around in the /. comments) botnets to negate the adverse effects.

Any thoughts on this? It’s a curiously fun conceptualization, but could this potentially be just digging a bigger grave for the internet?

Filed under: Current Events, Integrity

2 Comments »

  • 1
    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by Colin Dixon

    April 22, 2008 @ 9:56 pm

    So, the article plays fun with the idea of using a “good botnet” which was a term I used, but in actuality the good botnet I was referring to is one that’s made up of nodes from a CDN infrastructure like Akamai.

    I’m suggesting we build a good botnet by buying the machines, not steal one through nefarious means.

    –Colin

  • 2
    Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

    Comment by Anonymous

    May 15, 2008 @ 11:21 pm

    If you build a botnet by buying the machines, you’ll likely get a range of IP addresses. Then those IP addresses will be blocked by your targets. Then you have no more botnet.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment