Difference between revisions of "Student Projects:IT Patents And Copyrights"
From CSEP590TU
(→Patents & Copyrights) |
(→A Rough Outline?) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
| − | <li> | + | <li>Compare software ip ... |
| − | |||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li> | + | <li>To pharmaceutical ip</li> |
| − | + | <li>To classical ip (e.g. literature, music, art, ...)</li> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 29: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
| − | <li> | + | <li>Likes & dislikes of status quo by both (pro/con) sides</li> |
| + | <li>Problems w/ current system | ||
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | <li>Philosophical/theoretical</li> | ||
| + | <li>Practical</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
| + | </li> | ||
| + | <li>Ideal - what should it be like | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li> | + | <li>Fundamental rights |
| − | + | <ul> | |
| + | <li>For producers</li> | ||
| + | <li>For consumers</li> | ||
| + | </ul> | ||
| + | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
| + | <li>Attempts to change</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 4 November 2004
A Rough Outline?
- General theme - What is wrong w/ the current system, and how can we fix it??
- Possible Title: Patents, Copyright & Software – Square Pegs for a Round Hole?
- Areas to cover
- History
- Objectives
- Evolution
- Case law
- Legislation
- Compare software ip ...
- To pharmaceutical ip
- To classical ip (e.g. literature, music, art, ...)
- Treatment of IP by other governments
- Asia/Japan
- Europe
- India
- Australia
- Latin America
- Likes & dislikes of status quo by both (pro/con) sides
- Problems w/ current system
- Philosophical/theoretical
- Practical
- Ideal - what should it be like
- Fundamental rights
- For producers
- For consumers
- Fundamental rights
- Attempts to change
