Difference between revisions of "Student Projects:IT Patents And Copyrights"

From CSEP590TU
Jump to: navigation, search
(A Rough Outline?)
(A Rough Outline?)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</li>
 
</li>
 +
<li>Attempts to change</li>
 
<li>Ideal - what should it be like
 
<li>Ideal - what should it be like
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 44: Line 45:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</li>
 
</li>
 +
<li>Conflicts</li>
 +
<li>Possible compromises</li>
 +
<li>Proposal
 +
                        <ul>
 +
                        <li>Description</li>
 +
                        <li>Pros/Cons</li>
 +
                        </ul>
 +
                </li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</li>
 
</li>
<li>Attempts to change</li>
+
        <li>Conclusion
 +
                <ul>
 +
                <li>Next Steps</li>
 +
                <li>Summary</li>
 +
                </ul>
 +
        </li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>

Latest revision as of 04:54, 8 November 2004

A Rough Outline?

  • General theme - What is wrong w/ the current system, and how can we fix it??
  • Possible Title: Patents, Copyright & Software – Square Pegs for a Round Hole?
  • Areas to cover
    • History
    • Objectives
    • Evolution
      • Case law
      • Legislation
    • Compare software ip ...
      • To pharmaceutical ip
      • To classical ip (e.g. literature, music, art, ...)
    • Treatment of IP by other governments
      • Asia/Japan
      • Europe
      • India
      • Australia
      • Latin America
    • Likes & dislikes of status quo by both (pro/con) sides
    • Problems w/ current system
      • Philosophical/theoretical
      • Practical
    • Attempts to change
    • Ideal - what should it be like
      • Fundamental rights
        • For producers
        • For consumers
      • Conflicts
      • Possible compromises
      • Proposal
        • Description
        • Pros/Cons
    • Conclusion
      • Next Steps
      • Summary