Difference between revisions of "Student Projects:Database Protection:Project Description"

Revision as of 01:08, 8 November 2004

Back to our Main Project Page ===Title:=== Legislated Database Protection: Is It Working?

Team Members:

• Damon May (UW)
• Don Totten (UW)
• David Moss (UW)
• Elijah Esquibel (UCB)
• Charistel Ticong (UCB)

Description of Topic:

In this project we will explore the existing legislation protecting databases from unauthorized copying and use. We will investigate both the form and the effects of such legislation in the EU and in the US. We will discuss legislation that has not yet been implemented and compare it with the existing legislation that is beginning to have a track record.

These types of protection are in their infancy, and so there are a great variety of approaches to the problem, all of them largely untried and therefore, in a sense, equally valid. We will attempt to make a comparison between these different approaches and formulate an opinion as to the approach that best protects what it intends to protect while not placing undue restrictions on the scientific community.

The Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases (Lead Author: Damon May)

We will begin with a discussion of a piece of legislation aimed squarely at the topic of database protection, and one with a long track record. The Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases was adopted by the EU in 1996.

We will examine the protections that this Directive creates in detail, making clear:

• What the Directive explicitly does and does not allow
• The exceptions that it provides for scientific use
• The freedoms that it allows to member states in the creation of their own legislation
• The portions of the directive that are most ambiguous and/or troublesome

Next, we will examine some of the country-specific legislation that has sprung up to implement the Directive, e.g.

• Germany: Article 7 of The Information and Communication Services Act
• UK: 1997 Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations.

Then, we will judge it by its works. We will explore the precedents set by some of the court cases that have arisen from these country-specific pieces of legislation, for example:

• Germany
  • Medizinisches Lexicon 1998
  • Tele-Info-CD 1999
• UK
  • British Horseracing Board (BHB) v. William Hill Organization Ltd.

Based on these observations and analysis of some of the large body of commentary available on the EU Directive, we will form an opinion of the success of the Directive in encouraging innovation and protecting investment. We will weigh those potentially positive effects against the barriers that the Directive has raised to legitimate scientific use of information.

HIPAA (Lead Author: Don Totten)

Something something HIPAA.

What Do We Protect (Lead Authors: Elijah Esquibel and Charistel Ticong)

Something something What Do We Protect.

TBD (Lead Author: David Moss)

Something something TBD

Summary

Our goal is to summarize the current state of Database Protection legislation, examine some proposed legislations that have not yet come into being, and select from among these various protections the approach to database protection that we feel best fosters innovation while placing as few restrictions as possible on legitimate scientific research.