Difference between revisions of "Final rough draft--Dec. 3"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Attack and Defense: Improving Cybersecurity by 2014: Introduction 12/3/04]] | [[Attack and Defense: Improving Cybersecurity by 2014: Introduction 12/3/04]] | ||
− | [[Chapter I | + | [[Chapter I Software Vulnerabilities by Santeri (Santtu) Voutilainen 12/3/04]] |
[[Chapter II Title by Jack 12/3/04]] | [[Chapter II Title by Jack 12/3/04]] |
Revision as of 18:55, 3 December 2004
Attack and Defense: Improving Cybersecurity by 2014: Introduction 12/3/04
Chapter I Software Vulnerabilities by Santeri (Santtu) Voutilainen 12/3/04
Chapter II Title by Jack 12/3/04
Chapter III Title by John 12/3/04
Chapter IV Title by Andrew 12/3/04
Chapter V: A Lab to Certify Software by Caroline Benner 12/3/04
_____________________________________________
Notes on final rough drafts
Caroline Thanks for suggestions. I took them all except for shibboleth I think (if it's a word the New York Times uses I usually keep itand I couldn't think of something better. plus it's a cool word)
and the double negative in the first sentence I kept (tested some other folks on it and the vote was "not confusing" by 3-1. Again, couldn't think of a better way to say it.)
there are some pretty major changes, reworkings, based on interviews I did this week--sorry to spring this on you, but I think the thing is much better now.
I'm going to do more proofing and fixing up in word after class tonight--it's kind of a mess in the wiki but I assume we should turn in word so I'll focus on fixing that version.