Difference between revisions of "Final rough draft--Dec. 3"
m |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Conclusion 12/3/04]] | [[Conclusion 12/3/04]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | _____________________________________________- | ||
+ | '''Notes on final rough drafts''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Caroline]] Thanks for suggestions. I took them all except for shibboleth I think (if it's a word the New York Times uses I usually keep it is the rule I play by and I couldn't think of something better. plus it's a cool word) | ||
+ | |||
+ | and the double negative in the first sentence I kept (tested some other folks on it and the vote was "not confusing" by 3-1. Again, got lazy and couldn't think of a better way to say it.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | there are some pretty major changes, reworkings, based on interviews I did this week--sorry to spring this on you, but I think the thing is much better now. |
Revision as of 01:37, 3 December 2004
Attack and Defense: Improving Cybersecurity by 2014: Introduction 12/3/04
Chapter I Title by Santtu 12/3/04
Chapter II Title by Jack 12/3/04
Chapter III Title by John 12/3/04
Chapter IV Title by Andrew 12/3/04
Chapter V: A Lab to Certify Software by Caroline Benner 12/3/04
_____________________________________________- Notes on final rough drafts
Caroline Thanks for suggestions. I took them all except for shibboleth I think (if it's a word the New York Times uses I usually keep it is the rule I play by and I couldn't think of something better. plus it's a cool word)
and the double negative in the first sentence I kept (tested some other folks on it and the vote was "not confusing" by 3-1. Again, got lazy and couldn't think of a better way to say it.)
there are some pretty major changes, reworkings, based on interviews I did this week--sorry to spring this on you, but I think the thing is much better now.