Difference between revisions of "Developer Motivations"

From CSEP590TU
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion on Developer Motivations)
(Links to Papers Regarding Developer Motivations)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Links to Papers Regarding Developer Motivations ==
 
== Links to Papers Regarding Developer Motivations ==
 +
 +
http://noframes.linuxjournal.com/article/4915
  
 
== Interesting Quotes on Developer Motivations ==
 
== Interesting Quotes on Developer Motivations ==

Revision as of 07:03, 21 November 2004

Main Author: Gail Frederick

Links to Papers Regarding Developer Motivations

http://noframes.linuxjournal.com/article/4915

Interesting Quotes on Developer Motivations

Discussion on Developer Motivations

Richard Michaelson: (11/13/04) Here's a running list of supply-side explanations for individuals' (and firms') contributions to OS:

-as a hobby (“simply for the pleasure of doing so”)

-post-scarcity gift economy (which, at heart, is not based on classical economic theory, and instead, suggests an entirely non-economic explanation for human behavior)

-hacker ethics

-Lerner and Tirole’s: individuals participate only if they expect a net benefit, viewing their contribution as a means (ego-boosting, reputation, etc) to an end, which is fundamentally economic or commercial

-“scratch an itch”

-in opposition to Microsoft

-Natural outgrowth of free speech

-Open source software is more beneficial to society

-Flexibility and configurability

Note: I didn't write down in which article these reasons came up. And some of these came up multiple times in different articles. I think the first 5 are the more popular explanations for why developers drift to OS projects.